Sunday, March 18, 2012

Healthy Foods We All Should Be Eating

Some foods just aren't taken seriously. 

Consider celery, for example—forever the garnish, never the main meal. You might even downgrade it to bar fare, since the only stalks most guys eat are served alongside hot wings or immersed in Bloody Marys.

All of which is a shame, really. Besides being a perfect vehicle for peanut butter, this vegetable contains bone-beneficial silicon and cancer-fighting phenolic acids. And those aren't even what makes celery so good for you. 

You see, celery is just one of six underappreciated and undereaten foods that can instantly improve your diet. Make a place for them on your plate, and you'll gain a new respect for the health benefits they bestow—from lowering blood pressure to fighting belly fat. And the best part? You'll discover just how delicious health food can be. 

Celery

This water-loaded vegetable has a rep for being all crunch and no nutrition. But ditch that mindset: Celery contains stealth nutrients that heal. 

Why it's healthy: "My patients who eat four sticks of celery a day have seen modest reductions in their blood pressure—about 6 points systolic and 3 points diastolic," says Mark Houston, M. D., director of the Hypertension Institute at St. Thomas Hospital, in Nashville. It's possible that phytochemicals in celery, called phthalides, are responsible for this health boon. These compounds relax muscle tissue in artery walls and increase bloodflow, according to nutritionist Jonny Bowden, Ph. D., author of The 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth. And beyond the benefits to your BP, celery also fills you up—with hardly any calories. 

How to eat it: Try this low-carbohydrate, protein-packed recipe for a perfect snack any time of day. 

In a bowl, mix a 4.5-ounce can of low-sodium tuna (rinsed and drained), 1 tablespoon of balsamic vinegar, 1/4 cup of finely chopped onion, 1/4 cup of finely chopped apple, 2 tablespoons of fat-free mayonnaise, and some fresh ground pepper. Then spoon the mixture into celery stalks. (Think tuna salad on a log.) Makes 2 servings 

Per serving: 114 calories, 15 grams protein, 12 grams carbohydrates (3 grams fiber), 1 gram fat 

Seaweed

While this algae is a popular health food in Japan, it rarely makes it into U. S. homes. 

Why it's healthy: There are four classes of seaweeds—green, brown, red, and blue-green—and they're all packed with healthful nutrients. "Seaweeds are a great plant source of calcium," says nutritionist Alan Aragon, M.S. They're also loaded with potassium, which is essential for maintaining healthy blood-pressure levels. "Low potassium and high sodium intake can cause high blood pressure," Bowden says. "Most people know to limit sodium, but another way to combat the problem is to take in more potassium." 

How to eat it: In sushi, of course. You can also buy sheets of dried seaweed at Asian groceries, specialty health stores, or online at edenfoods.com. Use a coffee grinder to grind the sheets into a powder. Then use the powder as a healthy salt substitute that's great for seasoning salads and soups. 

Hemp Seeds

Despite the Cannabis classification, these seeds aren't for smoking. But they may provide medicinal benefits. 

Why they're healthy: "Hemp seeds are rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which reduce your risk of heart disease and stroke," says Cassandra Forsythe, Ph. D., a nutrition researcher at the University of Connecticut. What's more, a 1-ounce serving of the seeds provides 11 grams of protein—but not the kind of incomplete protein found in most plant sources. Hemp seeds provide all the essential amino acids, meaning the protein they contain is comparable to that found in meat, eggs, and dairy. 

How to eat them: Toss 2 tablespoons of the seeds into your oatmeal or stir-fry. Or add them to your postworkout shake for an extra dose of muscle-building protein. 

Scallops

Perhaps these mollusks are considered guilty by association, since they often appear in decadent restaurant meals that are overloaded with calories. (But then again, so does asparagus.) 

Why they're healthy: Scallops are more than 80 percent protein. "One 3-ounce serving provides 20 grams of protein and just 95 calories," says Bowden. They're also a good source of both magnesium and potassium. (Clams and oysters provide similar benefits.) 

How to eat them: Sear the scallops: It's a fast and easy way to prepare this seafood. 

Purchase fresh, dry-packed scallops (not the "wet-packed" kind) and place them on a large plate or cookie sheet. While you preheat a skillet on medium high, pat the scallops dry with a paper towel and season the exposed sides with sea salt and fresh cracked pepper. When the skillet is hot, add a tablespoon of olive oil to it. Being careful not to overcrowd, lay the scallops in the skillet, seasoned-side down, and then season the top sides. 

Sear the scallops until the bottoms are caramelized (about 2 minutes), and then flip them to sear for another 1 to 2 minutes, depending on size and thickness. Now they're ready to eat. Pair the scallops with sauteed vegetables, or place them on a bed of brown rice. 

Dark Meat

Sure, dark meat has more fat than white meat does, but have you ever considered what the actual difference is? Once you do, Thanksgiving won't be the only time you "call the drumstick." 

Why it's healthy: "The extra fat in dark turkey or chicken meat raises your levels of cholecystokinin (CCK), a hormone that makes you feel fuller, longer," says Aragon. The benefit: You'll be less likely to overeat in the hours that follow your meal. What about your cholesterol? Only a third of the fat in a turkey drumstick is the saturated kind, according to the USDA food database. (The other two-thirds are heart-healthy unsaturated fats.) What's more, 86 percent of that saturated fat either has no impact on cholesterol, or raises HDL (good) cholesterol more than LDL (bad) cholesterol—a result that actually lowers your heart-disease risk. 

As for calories, an ounce of dark turkey meat contains just 8 more calories than an ounce of white meat. 

How to eat it: Just enjoy, but be conscious of your total portion sizes. A good rule of thumb: Limit yourself to 8 ounces or less at any one sitting, which provides up to 423 calories. Eat that with a big serving of vegetables, and you'll have a flavorful fat-loss meal. 

Lentils

It's no surprise that these hearty legumes are good for you. But when was the last time you ate any? 

Why they're healthy: Boiled lentils have about 16 grams of belly-filling fiber in every cup. Cooked lentils also contain 27 percent more folate per cup than cooked spinach does. And if you eat colored lentils—black, orange, red—there are compounds in the seed hulls that contain disease-fighting antioxidants, says Raymond Glahn, Ph. D., a research physiologist with Cornell University. 

How to eat them: Use lentils as a bed for chicken, fish, or beef—they make a great substitute for rice or pasta. 

Pour 4 cups of chicken stock into a large pot. Add 1 cup of red or brown lentils and a half cup each of onion and carrot chunks, along with 3 teaspoons of minced garlic. Bring everything to a boil and then reduce the heat to a simmer. Cook the lentils until they're tender, about 20 minutes. Remove the lentils from the heat, add a splash of red-wine vinegar, and serve.

Posted via email from WellCare

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Each Minute of Your Precious Life!

Your purpose, that thing that among the many to-dos of your days, is what you must do. Embrace the truth of your purpose each minute of your precious life...for how very true it is that life begins when you do.

If you would dream it
BEGIN it.

If you have an idea
OPEN it.

If there is longing
ACKNOWLEDGE it.

If there is mission
COMMIT it.

If there is daring
DO it.

If there is love
SPEAK it.

If there is resource
USE it.

If there is abundance
SHARE it. 

Posted via email from Kleerstreem's Posterous

Thursday, March 15, 2012

THE PICKLE JAR

A professor stood before his philosophy class and had some items in front of him. When the class began, wordlessly he picked up a very large and empty pickle jar and proceeded to fill it with golf balls.

He then asked the students if the jar was full. They agreed that it was. So the professor then picked up a box of pebbles and poured them into the jar. He shook the jar lightly. The pebbles rolled into the open areas between the golf balls. He then asked the students again if the jar was full. They agreed it was.


The professor next picked up a box of sand and poured it into the jar. Of course, the sand filled up everything else. He asked once more if the jar was full. The students responded with a unanimous "yes."

The professor then produced two cans of beer from under the table and poured the entire contents into the jar effectively filling the empty space between the sand.

The students laughed.

The Moral of the Story - The professor waited for the laughter to subside....

"Now," said the professor, "I want you to recognize that this jar represents your life. The golf balls are the important things...your family, your children, your health, yourfriends, your favorite passions. Things that if everything else was lost and only they remained, your life would still be full."

"The pebbles are the other things that matter like your job, your home, your car."

"The sand is everything else...The small stuff. If you put the sand into the jar first, there is no room for the pebbles or the golf balls. The same goes for life. If you spend all your time and energy on the small stuff, you will never have room for the things that are critical to your happiness."

"Play with your children. Take time to get medical checkups. Take your partner to dinner. Play another 18. There will always be time to clean the house or fix the disposal."

"Take care of the golf balls first, the things that really matter. Set your priorities, the rest is just sand." 

Posted via email from Kleerstreem's Posterous

Monday, March 12, 2012

"America as the Last Man Standing"

---by a Dutch Member of Parliament named Geert Wilders.  It tells of what he calls the "Islamization of Europe" and warns that the United States is "the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe." 


Geert Wilders, chairman Party for Freedom, the Netherlands

Speech at the Four Seasons, New York

September 25, 2008

Dear friends,

Thank you very much for inviting me. Great to be at the Four Seasons. I come from a country that has one season only: a rainy season that starts January 1st and ends December 31st. When we have three sunny days in a row, the government declares a national emergency. So Four Seasons, that’s new to me.

It’s great to be in New York. When I see the skyscrapers and office buildings, I think of what Ayn Rand said: “The sky over New York and the will of man made visible.” Of course. Without the Dutch you would have been nowhere, still figuring out how to buy this island from the Indians. But we are glad we did it for you. And, frankly, you did a far better job than we possibly could have done.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The danger I see looming is the scenario of America as the last man standing. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe? Patriots from around Europe risk their lives every day to prevent precisely this scenario form becoming a reality.

My short lecture consists of 4 parts.

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. Thirdly, if you are still here, I will talk a little bit about the movie you just saw. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks. The Eiffel Tower and Trafalgar Square and Rome’s ancient buildings and maybe the canals of Amsterdam. They are still there. And they still look very much the same as they did a hundred years ago.

But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world, a world very few visitors see – and one that does not appear in your tourist guidebook. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration. All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corner. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear “whore, whore”. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin. In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can in many cases no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan. Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. A Dutch study reported that half of Dutch Muslims admit they “understand” the 9/11 attacks.

Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. Our elites are willing to give in. To give up. In my own country we have gone from calls by one cabinet member to turn Muslim holidays into official state holidays, to statements by another cabinet member, that Islam is part of Dutch culture, to an affirmation by the Christian-Democratic attorney general that he is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. Some prefer to see these as isolated incidents, but I call it a Muslim intifada. I call the perpetrators “settlers”. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies, they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighbourhoods, their cities, their countries.

Politicians shy away from taking a stand against this creeping sharia. They believe in the equality of all cultures. Moreover, on a mundane level, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

Our many problems with Islam cannot be explained by poverty, repression or the European colonial past, as the Left claims. Nor does it have anything to do with Palestinians or American troops in Iraq. The problem is Islam itself.

Allow me to give you a brief Islam 101. The first thing you need to know about Islam is the importance of the book of the Quran. The Quran is Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to Mohammed, the prophet. This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Quran is Allah’s word and therefore not open to discussion or interpretation. It is valid for every Muslim and for all times. Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam. Sure, there are a lot of moderate Muslims. But a moderate Islam is non-existent.

The Quran calls for hatred, violence, submission, murder, and terrorism. The Quran calls for Muslims to kill non-Muslims, to terrorize non-Muslims and to fulfil their duty to wage war: violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every Muslim, Islam is to rule the world – by the sword. The Quran is clearly anti-Semitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behaviour is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He advised on matters of slavery, but never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side.

Quran as Allah’s own word and Mohammed as the perfect man are the two most important facets of Islam. Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ‘submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

This is what you need to know about Islam, in order to understand what is going on in Europe. For millions of Muslims the Quran and the live of Mohammed are not 14 centuries old, but are an everyday reality, an ideal, that guide every aspect of their lives. Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam “the most retrograde force in the world”, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.

Which brings me to my movie, Fitna.

I am a lawmaker, and not a movie maker. But I felt I had the moral duty to educate about Islam. The duty to make clear that the Quran stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism but is in reality jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, and do not belong to its fringes.

Now, from the day the plan for my movie was made public, it caused quite a stir, in the Netherlands and throughout Europe. First, there was a political storm, with government leaders, across the continent in sheer panic. The Netherlands was put under a heightened terror alert, because of possible attacks or a revolt by our Muslim population. The Dutch branch of the Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir declared that the Netherlands was due for an attack. Internationally, there was a series of incidents. The Taliban threatened to organize additional attacks against Dutch troops in Afghanistan, and a website linked to Al Qaeda published the message that I ought to be killed, while various muftis in the Middle East stated that I would be responsible for all the bloodshed after the screening of the movie. In Afghanistan and Pakistan the Dutch flag was burned on several occasions. Dolls representing me were also burned. The Indonesian President announced that I will never be admitted into Indonesia again, while the UN Secretary General and the European Union issued cowardly statements in the same vein as those made by the Dutch Government. I could go on and on. It was an absolute disgrace, a sell-out.

A plethora of legal troubles also followed, and have not ended yet. Currently the state of Jordan is litigating against me. Only last week there were renewed security agency reports about a heightened terror alert for the Netherlands because of Fitna.

Now, I would like to say a few things about Israel. Because, very soon, we will get together in its capitol. The best way for a politician in Europe to loose votes is to say something positive about Israel. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I, however, will continue to speak up for Israel. I see defending Israel as a matter of principle. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

Samuel Huntington writes it so aptly: “Islam has bloody borders”. Israel is located precisely on that border. This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. Therefore, it is not that the West has a stake in Israel. It is Israel.

It is very difficult to be an optimist in the face of the growing Islamization of Europe. All the tides are against us. On all fronts we are losing. Demographically the momentum is with Islam. Muslim immigration is even a source of pride within ruling liberal parties. Academia, the arts, the media, trade unions, the churches, the business world, the entire political establishment have all converted to the suicidal theory of multiculturalism. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’. The entire establishment has sided with our enemy. Leftists, liberals and Christian-Democrats are now all in bed with Islam.

This is the most painful thing to see: the betrayal by our elites. At this moment in Europe’s history, our elites are supposed to lead us. To stand up for centuries of civilization. To defend our heritage. To honour our eternal Judeo-Christian values that made Europe what it is today. But there are very few signs of hope to be seen at the governmental level. Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown, Berlusconi; in private, they probably know how grave the situation is. But when the little red light goes on, they stare into the camera and tell us that Islam is a religion of peace, and we should all try to get along nicely and sing Kumbaya. They willingly participate in, what President Reagan so aptly called: “the betrayal of our past, the squandering of our freedom.”

If there is hope in Europe, it comes from the people, not from the elites. Change can only come from a grass-roots level. It has to come from the citizens themselves. Yet these patriots will have to take on the entire political, legal and media establishment.

Over the past years there have been some small, but encouraging, signs of a rebirth of the original European spirit. Maybe the elites turn their backs on freedom, the public does not. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat to our national identity. I don’t think the public opinion in Holland is very different from other European countries.

Patriotic parties that oppose jihad are growing, against all odds. My own party debuted two years ago, with five percent of the vote. Now it stands at ten percent in the polls. The same is true of all smililary-minded parties in Europe. They are fighting the liberal establishment, and are gaining footholds on the political arena, one voter at the time.

Now, for the first time, these patriotic parties will come together and exchange experiences. It may be the start of something big. Something that might change the map of Europe for decades to come. It might also be Europe’s last chance.

This December a conference will take place in Jerusalem. Thanks to Professor Aryeh Eldad, a member of Knesset, we will be able to watch Fitna in the Knesset building and discuss the jihad. We are organizing this event in Israel to emphasize the fact that we are all in the same boat together, and that Israel is part of our common heritage. Those attending will be a select audience. No racist organizations will be allowed. And we will only admit parties that are solidly democratic.

This conference will be the start of an Alliance of European patriots. This Alliance will serve as the backbone for all organizations and political parties that oppose jihad and Islamization. For this Alliance I seek your support.

This endeavor may be crucial to America and to the West. America may hold fast to the dream that, thanks tot its location, it is safe from jihad and shaira. But seven years ago to the day, there was still smoke rising from ground zero, following the attacks that forever shattered that dream. Yet there is a danger even greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America - as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.

This is not the first time our civilization is under threat. We have seen dangers before. We have been betrayed by our elites before. They have sided with our enemies before. And yet, then, freedom prevailed.

These are not times in which to take lessons from appeasement, capitulation, giving away, giving up or giving in. These are not times in which to draw lessons from Mr. Chamberlain. These are times calling us to draw lessons from Mr. Churchill and the words he spoke in 1942:

“Never give in, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy”.

Posted via email from Global Politics

Friday, March 9, 2012

Why Do We Still Need Missionaries?

Q: Our church just had a missions conference, but isn't the day of foreign missions finished? Most countries now have their own churches, and anyway almost everyone can hear the story of Jesus over radio or the Internet. Why do we still need missionaries? -- G.R. 

A: Recently, someone called my attention to an address by a Christian leader from a country which has very few Christians. He had one main message: We still need missionaries to come to our nation. 

Remember, Jesus' command to preach the Gospel to the ends of the earth has never been withdrawn -- nor will it be until He comes again. His final words to His disciples were absolutely clear: "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation" (Mark 16:15). Billions of people today are lost in a maze of spiritual confusion and darkness, and they need the life-changing message of Christ. More than that, they need hope -- hope for this life, and hope for the life to come. How can we remain silent? 

Missionaries today carry out Christ's command in many ways, not only by preaching the Gospel but by demonstrating Christ's love and compassion to those in need (something the Internet can never replace). Jesus said we serve Him even when we give "a cup of cold water to one of these little ones" (Matthew 10:42). My son Franklin's Christian humanitarian aid ministry, Samaritan's Purse, works in over 100 countries to bring relief and assistance to people whose lives have been torn apart by disaster or turmoil. 

Pray for your church's missionaries, and support them generously (especially during these difficult economic times). More than that, pray that God will raise up a new generation of young people who will respond to His call to bring Christ to the nations. 

Posted via email from Religion

Monday, March 5, 2012

SUPER TUESDAY: Awarding State's Delegates ..... Very Confusing

Although the Super Tuesday states are a mix of favorable and unfavorable terrain for Mitt Romney, his situation has improved enough that he could be on track to win an outright majority of the delegates on the night.

Indeed, Mr. Romney could secure the delegate majority even if he wins as few as 4 or 5 states, based on an analysis of the current polling in each state and the complex series of rules that are used to govern delegate allocation. This path involves Mr. Romney winning all or nearly all of the delegates in his strongest states, while getting a decent minority of them in the states that he does not win; many of which tend to have more proportional delegate allocation rules.

The only way to do this correctly is to go through the states one at a time, as I have done here. States are listed in order of their total number of delegates. Combined, the 10 states that will vote on Super Tuesday have 437 delegates, although only 422 delegates are up for grabs since 15 of them are super delegates who are unbound to the results in each state. Therefore, a majority would require either 212 or 219 delegates, depending on whether you include these super delegates in the denominator.

Georgia — 76 delegates
The delegate math
: In Georgia, 42 delegates are awarded by Congressional district; a candidate wins all 3 delegates in a district if he gets a majority there, otherwise they are split 2-to-1 between the top two finishers. Another 31 delegates are awarded proportionately among candidates winning at least 20 percent of the vote. Finally, Georgia is among the states that binds its 3 super delegates; they awarded winner-take-all to the statewide victor.
The polling: Newt Gingrich has had some favorable momentum in recent polls and looks as though he will win his home state. The FiveThirtyEight model projects him to get 43 percent of the vote, versus 27 percent for Mr. Romney and 21 percent for Mr. Santorum.
The projection: Mr. Gingrich may earn a majority of the vote in his stronger Congressional districts, allowing him to earn 3 rather than 2 delegates from them. But Mr. Romney may also win a couple of districts, especially some of the wealthier ones in suburban Atlanta. Mr. Santorum, projected to take 21 percent of the vote statewide, is in some danger of failing to meet the 20 percent qualifying threshold that would make him eligible for statewide delegates. On the plus side for Mr. Santorum, he’s not that far behind Mr. Romney in the polls and should take second place in some of the more rural Congressional districts. I project 43 delegates for Mr. Gingrich, 24 for Mr. Romney, and 9 for Mr. Santorum.

Ohio — 66 delegates
The delegate math
: In Ohio, most of the delegates (48) are awarded winner-take-all by Congressional district. Note, however, that Rick Santorum does not have not have full delegate slates in some districts and will not be eligible to win them there. Another 15 delegates will be awarded proportionately among candidates winning at least 20 percent of the vote statewide — unless one candidate gets an outright majority, in which case he wins all 15. Finally, Ohio’s 3 super delegates are unbound by the results of the primary.
The polling: The polls still show Mr. Santorum with the tiniest of advantages in Ohio. The conventional wisdom holds that Mr. Romney is closing strongly, which may be the case — but our forecasts are supposed to account for a candidate’s momentum, and when I look at some of thenonpolling factors in the state, they don’t seem tremendously favorable to Mr. Romney. It’s fine to think of the state as a tossup, but I don’t yet see the case to think of Mr. Santorum as the underdog.
The projection: Whether or not Mr. Romney is a favorite to win the popular vote in Ohio, however, he is probably the favorite to take the plurality of delegates there because of Mr. Santorum’s delegate problems. Indeed, up to 18 delegates could potentially be affected by this and some are in areas that Mr. Santorum would otherwise be favored to win. Therefore, I am taking half of these delegates and placing them into the unbound category (candidates can later petition the state to lay a claim to them), along with Ohio’s 3 super delegates. I project the remaining delegates 28 for Mr. Romney and 26 for Mr. Santorum. Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul currently project below 20 percent of the vote, which would leave them ineligible for statewide delegates, although Mr. Gingrich has some chance of hitting that threshold.

Tennessee — 58 delegates
The delegate math
: Here, 27 delegates are awarded by Congressional district; but the rules are slightly complicated. A candidate wins all 3 delegates in a district if he gets two-thirds of the vote there — not a mere majority, as in most other states. Otherwise, they are split 2-to-1 between the top two finishers in most circumstances. Another 28 delegates are awarded proportionately among candidates winning at least 20 percent of the vote unless one candidate wins two-thirds of the vote statewide (again, not just a majority), in which case he takes all of them. Tennessee’s 3 super delegates are unbound.
The polling: Mr. Romney has reduced much of his deficit against Mr. Santorum in the Tennessee polls and now trails by about 4 points. The delegate math aside, a win for Mr. Romney here — in a Southern state that did not figure to be favorable for him — would remove much of the doubt about whether Super Tuesday had been a “good” day for him.
The projection: Because Tennessee requires candidates to win two-thirds of the vote before winner-take-all rules apply, its delegates should be split in a relatively proportional way, both at the state level and in the congressional districts. The 20 percent threshold that determines whether a candidate is eligible for statewide delegates could come into play, however, since Mr. Gingrich projects to almost exactly that level. I am giving Mr. Gingrich the benefit of the doubt and assigning him 6 delegates, but 26 go to Mr. Santorum and 22 to Mr. Romney. My best guess is that Mr. Romney might be favored to win the 2nd, 5th and 7th Congressional districts if he loses the vote by just a few points statewide, so some of his delegates come from these areas.

Virginia — 46 delegates
The delegate math
: Like Georgia, Virginia awards many of its delegates, 33, on a winner-take-all basis by Congressional district. The other 13 are de facto winner-take-all based on the statewide vote given that there are only two candidates, Mr. Romney and Mr. Paul, on the ballot and that one of them is guaranteed to achieve a majority. Virginia’s 3 super delegates are unbound.
The polling: Some of the polls have shown high numbers of undecided voters — perhaps those who are confused or disappointed that they cannot vote for Mr. Santorum or Mr. Gingrich — and it is unclear how such voters will behave at the ballot booth. Still, there does not seem to be any concerted effort to focus around Mr. Paul as an “anybody but Romney” default and Mr. Romney should win big here. Our forecast model thinks he’ll get somewhere between 60 and 78 percent of the vote, with totals in the low 70’s being the most likely figure.
The projection: Mr. Romney will win the 13 statewide delegates unless there is an incredible surprise. The size of his margin against Mr. Paul could be more pertinent at the Congressional district level, however. Something like the 5th Congressional district, which is rural and poor and contains the college town of Charlottesville, could give Mr. Paul a chance to get on the board. I am giving Mr. Paul credit for one Congressional district win and therefore 3 delegates, with Mr. Romney getting 43 delegates total between the state and the districts.

Oklahoma — 43 delegates
The delegate math
: Each of Oklahoma’s 5 congressional districts awards 3 delegates, or 15 total. As in Georgia, a candidate takes all 3 if he wins a majority in the district. Otherwise, they are split either 2-to-1 or 1-1-1 depending on how many candidates get at least 15 percent of the vote there. Another 25 delegates are determined by the statewide vote and are allocated proportionately among candidates hitting a 15 percent qualifying threshold — but a candidate can circumvent this and take all 25 delegates if he takes a majority in the state. Oklahoma also has 3 super delegates, who are unbound by the primary result.
The polling: This is Mr. Santorum’s strongest state, although he has slipped some — he now projects to 39 percent of the vote, whereas he had been on track for a percentage in the 40’s before. Mr. Romney is in second at 28 percent — the model lays about 10-to-1 odds against his pulling off a huge upset and winning the state — with Mr. Gingrich at 23 percent.
The projection: Taking the FiveThirtyEight forecast and assuming that Mr. Santorum will win 4 of the 5 Congressional districts (but by varying margins and triggering different delegate rules) works out to about 22 delegates for him, with Mr. Romney getting 11 and Mr. Gingrich 7. Back when Mr. Santorum’s numbers were a little stronger, the 50 percent majority threshold had seemed to be within reach, in which case he could have won all 39 elected delegates. But that looks unlikely now; the high end of his forecast range runs to 48 percent instead.

Massachusetts — 41 delegates
The delegate math
: Massachusetts’ rules are relatively simple: 38 are awarded proportionately among candidates getting at least 15 percent of the vote statewide. Its 3 super delegates are unbound.
The polling: Mr. Romney projects to 64 percent of the vote in his home state, with Mr. Santorum at 21 percent and Mr. Paul at 9 percent.
The projection: The question is whether Mr. Santorum and perhaps Mr. Paul will hit the 15 percent threshold required to be eligible for statewide delegates. I’m just taking the results from our forecasts verbatim, which project that Mr. Santorum will and Mr. Paul will not, although neither outcome is certain. That yields a projection of 29 delegates for Mr. Romney and 9 for Mr. Santorum.

Idaho — 32 delegates
The delegate math
: Idaho’s delegate allocation rules are perhaps the most complex in the country. Initially, they are awarded winner-take-all by county after a series of votes in which candidates are successively eliminated from the ballot, somewhat like the viability threshold that Democrats use in their caucuses in Iowa. Then, if a candidate receives 50 percent or more of the county delegates once these results are tallied, he receives all 32 delegates to the national convention; otherwise they are split proportionately in accordance with the number of county delegates.
The polling: There has been no polling at all in Idaho.
The projection: Idaho has the nation’s second-highest concentration of Mormon voters after Utah — they represent 27 percent of the population there, according to one estimate. Back before Mr. Romney won caucuses in Maine and Washington, it seemed like his problems in caucus states were significant enough that one of the other candidates might have a chance here. Mr. Santorum campaigned some in the state, and Mr. Paul performed fairly strongly in some of the Washington counties that border Idaho. However, with Mr. Romney having stabilized himself in caucuses, his advantage with the Mormon vote should be enough to carry the day. Idaho is also the rare Republican state where second-choice preferences matter since candidates are sequentially eliminated from the ballot if they do not have enough votes, something which could harm Mr. Paul since his support tends to be all-or-nothing. I am guessing that Mr. Romney’s advantages will be clear enough that he will win all 32 of Idaho’s delegates once the various criteria are applied to calculate them.

North Dakota — 28 delegates
The delegate math
: North Dakota’s caucus rules are more straightforward than in most other states: there is just one vote taken in each precinct, with delegate allocation tied directly, and roughly proportionately, to presidential preference.
The polling: Nobody was compelled to poll North Dakota.
The projection: Before Washington and Maine, I would have considered Mr. Santorum the favorite here, since he won the neighboring state of Minnesota by a wide margin and since Mr. Romney has struggled in rural areas in the middle part of the country. But Mr. Santorum has performed disappointingly in caucuses since then, and Mr. Romney made a recent visit to Fargo; meanwhile, the state has a lot of new-found wealth because of its oil boom .Therefore, although it will receive less attention than something like Tennessee, North Dakota could present another opportunity for Mr. Romney to demonstrate the breadth of his coalition. Since the delegate allocation is roughly proportional, I am simply dividing it about evenly for now: 9 delegates to Mr. Santorum, 9 to Mr. Romney, 8 to Mr. Paul, and 2 for Mr. Gingrich.

Alaska — 27 delegates
The delegate math
: Of Alaska’s 27 delegates, 24 are awarded approximately proportionately based on the statewide caucus vote. As in North Dakota, there is just one vote taken in each precinct with with delegate allocation directly tied to presidential preference. Furthermore, as in Nevada (but unlike North Dakota) these delegates are formally bound at the convention. However, Alaska’s 3 super delegates are unbound and not determined in any way by the caucus outcome.
The polling: Like the other caucus states, Alaska has received no polling.
The projection: Alaska is a famously unpredictable state, but Mr. Romney won the caucuses there in 2008. Mr. Paul, however, has raised more money than Mr. Romney in Alaska this year, one of the few states in which this is true, and the state can have fairly strong libertarian leanings. Meanwhile, although Alaska is less socially conservative than fiscally conservative, it has its fair share of evangelical voters. I see the state as a Romney-Paul tossup with Mr. Santorum having some outside chances, and allocate the delegates 8 to Mr. Romney, 8 to Mr. Paul, 6 to Mr. Santorum, and 2 to Mr. Gingrich.

Vermont — 17 delegates
The delegate math
:Vermont’s 3 super delegates are bound by the results of the primary and awarded on a winner-take-all basis. The remaining 14 are awarded proportionately with a 20 percent qualifying threshold, although they convert to winner-take-all if one candidate achieves a majority.
The polling: We have not run a projection here, but there was one poll of Vermont, although it is somewhat dated and was conducted at a time when Mr. Santorum’s national standing was stronger. That poll, from Castelton College, gave Mr. Romney 34 percent of the vote, Mr. Santorum 27 percent, and Mr. Paul 14 percent.
The projection: I’m very reluctant to lean on a single poll of a state. Still, the results are enough to suggest that Mr. Romney may not be a favorite to hit the majority threshold he would need to take all of the state’s delegates. Vermont’s demographics are not all that favorable to Mr. Romney: although it is in New England, it is very rural and has relatively low incomes and something of an anti-establishment streak. However, Vermont is certainly not socially conservative, and the state’s primary is open to all voters — so I somewhat doubt the poll’s finding that Mr. Santorum is competitive there. Indeed, Mr. Santorum could have trouble getting enough votes to hit the 20 percent threshold required to be dealt in to delegate allocation. Vermont may, however, be a decent state for Mr. Paul, who ran quite evenly with Mr. Romney in the western New Hampshire towns that border Vermont. Given the uncertainty here, it is not totally out of the question that Mr. Romney could lose Vermont, although it is also not out of the question that he could perform much better than the Castelton poll and hit the winner-take-all threshold. My best guess is that Mr. Paul will get 6 delegates, with Mr. Romney taking the other 11.

Posted via email from Global Politics

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Why People Lie To Marketers and Salespeople

Someone who chooses not to buy from you isn't stupid. They're not unable to process ideas logically, nor are they unethical or manipulated by others. No, it's simpler than that:

Given what they know and what they believe, the prospect is making exactly the right decision.

We always make our decision based on what we know and believe. That's a tautology, based on the definition... a decision is the path you take based on what you know and believe, right?

The challenge, then, it seems to me, is to realize that perhaps the prospect knows something you don't, or, just as likely, doesn't believe what you believe. Your job as a marketer is to figure out what your prospect's biases and worldview and fears and beliefs are, and as a salesperson, your job is to help them know what you know.

If you keep questioning our judgment, we're going to keep lying to you.

Posted via email from Kleerstreem's Posterous

Friday, March 2, 2012

My Analysis of Remaining GOP Primaries....Will We Have A Candidate??? Maybe OR Maybe NOT!

I have no idea why one state is more of a must win state than another.  How many times have we heard this?   Way too many, but, I guess it keeps the debate going on and ratings up for the media.

Super Tuesday will tell us something, but, it won't be do or die day for any of the contenders.  Rather than Super Tuesday, I think we should be calling March SUPER March.  Why??? All total March has 850+ delegates up for grabs. Most likely the 850 delegates will be split between Mitt, Newt, and Rick..  

Then we get into April with another 350 + delegates.  By the end of April, we should have a decent idea about who will be the GOP candidate?  Maybe???  If March and April are split proportionally between 2 or 3 candidates, then we could be entering May with none of the candidates having more than 500 to 800 delegates.  So we get into May and the big state with the most delegates will be TX on May 29 with 155.  May total delegates is 431.   

So April and May there will be another 760 delegates up for grabs...stay with me..:) 

Delegates from March - June are:

March              860

April                 329

May                 431   (Because TX primary has now be scheduled for May 29)

June                339

Grand Total:    1,959 Delegates.  

This won't happen, but, if Santorum and Mitt spit the 1,959 evenly, neither would have enough delegates to reach 1144.   Plus, don't you think Newt or Paul might win a few states along the way? 

So, to keep writing one state or the other is a do or die state for any of the candidates, at this point in time, at best, is just a wild guess.  

If the delegate count should stay within 2-4% among the top two contenders, the most critical state could turn out to be UTAH with 40 delegates.  Anyone want to guess who wins UTAH?   

For any of the contenders to reach 1144 by the end of April, one of them  would have to win between 78%  to 90% of all the delegates in those two months.   I don't see that happening.

Summary:  Any contender who might get lucky and win every state in March still doesn't have 1144, not even Romney.   My take on the GOP winner, if we have one, it will happen between May 29 and the end of June....Otherwise, one of the contenders will have to get extremely lucky prior to May 29. (Stay with me)

Sidebar:....  I like many am  praying for a brokered convention which, most likely won't happen.  Which leaves the convention open for a lot of 'horse trading' of delegates.  Why??? Because there will be 477 unpledged delegates at the convention.  Those unpleadged delegates, are not bound to any candidate which means they are free to cast their vote for any of the contenders or someone that's not a contender. Which will it be, no one knows.

Again, bottom  line, we most likely will not know who the GOP Candidate will be until the GOP Convention.   But, in politics, we never know when one of the candidates may catch on fire and other candidate(s) 'fire' may 'flame' out???

THE OTHER THING THAT COULD THROW THIS POSTS LOGIC OUT THE DOOR,  WOULD BE IF 2 OF THE CONTENDERS SUSPENDED THEIR CAMPAIGNS AND ENDORSED ONE OF THE REMAINING TWO.   BUT, EVEN IF THAT HAPPENS, I AM CERTAIN THE 2012 GOP PRIMARIES WILL MOST LIKELY GO UNTIL MAY 1 OR MAY 29.   

Sorry this is so long, but, I am  big on facts and not rhetoric.  Thanks for reading.

Posted via email from Global Politics

My Analysis of Remaining GOP Primaries....Will We Have A Candidate??? Maybe OR Maybe NOT!

I have no idea why one state is more of a must win state than another.  How many times have we heard this?   Way too many, but, I guess it keeps the debate going on and ratings up for the media.

Super Tuesday will tell us something, but, it won't be do or die day for any of the contenders.  Rather than Super Tuesday, I think we should be calling March SUPER March.  Why??? All total March has 850+ delegates up for grabs. Most likely the 850 delegates will be split between Mitt, Newt, and Rick..  

Then we get into April with another 350 + delegates.  By the end of April, we should have a decent idea about who will be the GOP candidate?  Maybe???  If March and April are split proportionally between 2 or 3 candidates, then we could be entering May with none of the candidates having more than 500 to 800 delegates.  So we get into May and the big state with the most delegates will be TX on May 29 with 155.  May total delegates is 431.   

So April and May there will be another 760 delegates up for grabs...stay with me..:) 

Delegates from March - June are:

March              860

April                 329

May                 431   (Because TX primary has now be scheduled for May 29)

June                339

Grand Total:    1,959 Delegates.  

This won't happen, but, if Santorum and Mitt spit the 1,959 evenly, neither would have enough delegates to reach 1144.   Plus, don't you think Newt or Paul might win a few states along the way? 

So, to keep writing one state or the other is a do or die state for any of the candidates, at this point in time, at best, is just a wild guess.  

If the delegate count should stay within 2-4% among the top two contenders, the most critical state could turn out to be UTAH with 40 delegates.  Anyone want to guess who wins UTAH?   

For any of the contenders to reach 1144 by the end of April, one of them  would have to win between 78%  to 90% of all the delegates in those two months.   I don't see that happening.

Summary:  Any contender who might get lucky and win every state in March still doesn't have 1144, not even Romney.   My take on the GOP winner, if we have one, it will happen between May 29 and the end of June....Otherwise, one of the contenders will have to get extremely lucky prior to May 29. (Stay with me)

Sidebar:....  I like many am  praying for a brokered convention which, most likely won't happen.  Which leaves the convention open for a lot of 'horse trading' of delegates.  Why??? Because there will be 477 unpledged delegates at the convention.  Those unpleadged delegates, are not bound to any candidate which means they are free to cast their vote for any of the contenders or someone that's not a contender. Which will it be, no one knows.

Again, bottom  line, we most likely will not know who the GOP Candidate will be until the GOP Convention.   But, in politics, we never know when one of the candidates may catch on fire and other candidate(s) 'fire' may 'flame' out???

THE OTHER THING THAT COULD THROW THIS POSTS LOGIC OUT THE DOOR,  WOULD BE IF 2 OF THE CONTENDERS SUSPENDED THEIR CAMPAIGNS AND ENDORSED ONE OF THE REMAINING TWO.   BUT, EVEN IF THAT HAPPENS, I AM CERTAIN THE 2012 GOP PRIMARIES WILL MOST LIKELY GO UNTIL MAY 1 OR MAY 29.   

Sorry this is so long, but, I am  big on facts and not rhetoric.  Thanks for reading.

Posted via email from Kleerstreem's Posterous

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Food Lovers to Flock to Original Marathon Seafood Festival March 10-11

Indigenous seafood such as Florida spiny lobster, are the anchoring attractions of the area's local commercial fishing heritage.

Indigenous seafood such as Florida spiny lobster, are the anchoring attractions of the area's local commercial fishing heritage.

Bring a hearty appetite to dig in to this annual seafood lover's feast, one of the largest in the Keys.

Bring a hearty appetite to dig in to this annual seafood lover's feast, one of the largest in the Keys.

MARATHON, Florida Keys — What started as a community event to bolster tourism business has, more than 30 years later, become one of the Middle Keys' most anticipated and sumptuous weekends. The Original Marathon Seafood Festival, set for Saturday and Sunday, March 10-11, features a feast of fish, shrimp, lobster and conch for tens of thousands of seafood lovers.

Indigenous seafood such as mahi-mahi, Florida lobster, succulent stone crab claws, plump pink shrimp and smoked fish are the anchoring attractions of the area's local commercial fishing heritage. These local delicacies and more are to be available at Marathon Community Park, mile marker 49 on the Florida Keys Overseas Highway.

Foods prepared according to secret recipes highlight the annual munch-a-thon, and Keys chefs are to offer conch chowder, salad and fritters as well as fresh oysters, clams and fried local fish. Attendees should save room for sweets like Key lime pie, cakes, cool smoothies and icy treats to top off the seafood extravaganza.

Staple festival attractions include children's games and more than 200 vendor booths with a variety of wares created by artists and craftspeople, nautical items, tropically themed clothing and apparel, plants and flowers, boats and watersports gear.

Among the weekend's scheduled entertainers are headliner and country music favorite Amber Leigh, slated to perform Sunday, as well as other popular Keys entertainers.

Festival hours are 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. Saturday and 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Sunday.

Admission is $5 per adult. Children under 12 accompanied by a paying adult are admitted free.

The festival is co-sponsored by the Marathon Chapter of the Organized Fishermen of Florida and the Marathon Chamber of Commerce. As in the past, proceeds benefit local scholarship programs.

Event information: marathonseafoodfestival.com or 305-743-5417 
Marathon visitor information: fla-keys.com/marathon or 1-800-262-7284 

Posted via email from Kleerstreem's Posterous